'all nations occupy positions on a continuum which runs from traditional societies to modern societies'
-Rostow proposed that there were 5 stages through which all countries have to pass through in the development process
- suggests that higher levels of consumer demand, entrepreneurship and increased technological knowledge = higher levels of economic growth
Popularity
- popular in the 1960s - during which post-WW2 economic boom provided hope of prosperity for all countries
- followed the belief that countries were following a slow but inevitable path to western prosperity
- provides governments with a clear path to development
- idea of 'take off' suggests rapid development
- economic growth provides jobs and increases standards of living
Criticism
- Eurocentric - suggests that all countries will follow the same pattern as MEDCs in Europe and N.America
- modelled on the wealthiest countries - LEDCs will most likely develop differently
- due to the economic crises of the late 1960s and early 1970s, the model became less fashionable
- focusses only on economic development, with quality of life becoming desirable once this is established which isn't necessarily the case - especially in countries with high cultural values
- technological leapfrogging may result in countries missing out a few stages
- industrial revolutions and economic growth can cause environmental degredation
- challenged by new theories...
Dependency Theory - Andre Gunder Frank
'Links between developed and less-developed countries are the cause of worsening conditions in the developing world'
'Underdevelopment is a consequence of the way in which the world economy works'
- In a globalised world, countries are interconnected through trade - some are winners and some losers- countries become wealthy by exploiting the poorest nations through unfair trade
- Latin America's underdevelopment is due to its involvement in capitalist trade
- The elite groups within the continent which have acted in the interests of capitalists in Europe and North America were rewarded with relative wealth and power - this has created a 'dual society'
Positives
- industry in the 'periphery' (developing countries) given subsidies to develop
- barriers to foreign imports encourage citizens to buy nationally-produced goods
- government intervention could make global trade inefficient
- spending to support industry could be spent elsewhere, e.g. education, healthcare or infrastructure
- trade barriers could increase cost of living for citizens
World Systems Theory - Immanuel Wallerstein
- Core countries are developed, capitalist countries that exploit peripheral (developing) countries for labour and raw materials
- Peripheral countries are dependent on the money gained by selling raw materials
- however, inevitably, the manufactured product in the core country sells for much more than the periphery, so the core can benefit and develop from the profits
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.